Member since Nov 2009 ·
17 posts · Location: Bothell, WA USA
Group memberships: Members
I had a little more time to look at 070r236 on two additional machines while my daughter was visiting from college this weekend.
Machine 3 (Laptop):
Windows XP SP2
Intel Core2 Duo CPU T5450 1.66GHz
3GB RAM
Wireless G
Display: Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset
SigmaTel High Definition Audio CODEC
I didn't get too far on this machine because Wireless-G is too slow for playing 480i and 720p/t programming. From appearances, between "Rebuffering" activity, 480i and 720p/t programming appeared to play properly. With the rebuffering issue, I didn't bother spending much time on this machine.
Machine 4:
Windows XP Professional (5.01.2600) SP2
DirectX 9.0c
Intel Petium D 2.8GHz / 200MHz bus
ASUSTeK P5LD2-VM motherboard
3GB RAM
NVIDIA Vanta/Vanta LT video
Realtek HD Audio
This machine plays all i480, 720p/t programming using 070r236 (not c1). On the 720p programming it always starts with audio, and will fairly consistently stops after some 30sec-5min with the dialog about audio sync issues. This is a false detection, because up to this point, the program is playing properly. 720t programming is better behaved than 720p. I think I saw one of the 720t programs claim to lose audio sync, when it was in fact playing just fine. 480i seems to play fine with no complaints.
This is interesting to me because the Pentium-D system (Machine 4) is a slower machine and busier (more heavily loaded) than the AMD system (Machine 1). Typical physical memory usage is around 1.5GB-2GB. So why this machine would actually work better is something I can't currently fathom. This sytem is also running a second Windows XP session used remotely by a European relative. This machine is also used by me for schematic/PCB work and MSVC sonar application development, Thunderbird email, OpenOffice, and X-Server applications. It also has the most cantankerous installation of XP SP2. So when it's stable, I don't let MS "update" XP until I have enough time set aside to fiddle getting it "stable" again. This system has the largest number of installed apps and codecs of any of the machines. I use VMware Server to keep some of the larger applications separate from each other for stability reasons. i.e. Hardware CAE and systems requirements tools separate from Software development tools. In the past older versions of these applications fairly thoroughly clobbered each other. This machine has undergone 3 full reinstalls of XP in the past to clear out all the cruft and restore it to usable condition again. Linux is definitely more stable for heavy workstation use even with CodeWeaver (commercial WINE) and VMware to handle a few Windows apps with no comparable Linux equivalents (such as Quickbooks and Quicken for accounting).
As a benchmark, I have another Linux Server system playing the same programming over the network using Mythfrontend under OpenSUSE 10.3 x64 on an AMD Athlon X2 5200+. This machine is also a heavily loaded server with 8GB RAM, 1.5TB RAID5, running 3 OS's-two under VMware Server, Open-Xchange, Asterisk VoIP, email, web services, SMB file sharing, etc. It never has a problem playing any of the 480i, 720t, 720p programs, which leads me to conclude I can mostly rule out network or network viewing issues with the MythTV Server machine. My network has a Gigabit backbone connecting servers and different floors of the house. a 24 port 100BaseT switch on one floor and three 8 port gigabit switches on different floors connect machines and appliances together. This network is debugged and working reliably.

This post was edited on 2009-11-11, 03:41 by
craigarno.